Midas mTBILL MTBILL
Quick Answer

Is Midas mTBILL halal?

No. Midas mTBILL is not considered halal, with a Shariah compliance score of 41.2/100 under our 27-point screening methodology.

Overall41.2Haram · Not Permissible
Riba23.4Haram
Gharar51.4Mashbooh
Maysir53.5Mashbooh
41.223.4RIBA51.4GHARAR53.5MAYSIR
Shariah screening · tap a sub-dial
Project diligence tap a tile →

RibaSharia pillar · 23.4/100 · Avoid · 10 criteria

Haram. Prohibition of guaranteed, time-based returns on money.

Sign in free to see which criteria these scores belong to.

Core Protocol Business15
Transaction Fees65
Treasury Assets10
Revenue Model12
Protocol Revenue12
Interest Assessment8
Rewards Distribution15
Asset Backing12
Islamic Contract Classification20
Rewards Structure65
How MTBILL compares
VNX Gold
65
Midas mBASIS
46
Midas mTBILL (MTBILL)
41.2
Nest Treasury Vault
41.1
Ondo US Dollar Yield
38.2

Compare directly: vs Midas mBASIS · vs Ondo US Dollar Yield · vs VNX Gold

Key facts
ChainEthereum
Last reviewed
Analyst summary

Midas mTBILL tokenizes short-duration US Treasury Bills as an ERC-20 across Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum and Algorand, referencing BlackRock's BUIDL and Superstate's USTB. Hacken audited the smart contracts in December 2023 (scoring 10/10), with further review by Côme du Crest and a Sherlock contest in May 2024. Governance is centralized: admin keys can mint, burn, blacklist, and set oracle prices. The single biggest Shariah consideration is unavoidable: mTBILL's entire yield mechanism is interest income on sovereign debt, passed through via daily NAV appreciation — this is riba by design, not incidental misuse.

The research

27-point Shariah breakdown of MTBILL

Islamic Finance Principles Assessment

Riba — Does Midas mTBILL involve interest?

Midas mTBILL is built entirely around interest-bearing instruments: it tokenizes claims on short-dated US Treasury Bills and passes that interest through to holders via NAV appreciation. This is not a peripheral feature but the core value proposition of the token. For Muslim investors, this places mTBILL in a category that is difficult to separate from riba, regardless of how well-run or well-audited the platform is.

Assessment: Riba Dominant Score: 23.4/100

Our methodology examines 10 criteria to evaluate how well Midas mTBILL avoids interest-based mechanisms.

Midas's revenue comes from management, performance, and redemption fees layered atop interest generated by underlying Treasury Bills. Management and minting fees are currently 0%, performance fees (10%) are waived, and redemption carries a 0.07% fee plus an instant-redemption surcharge. Regardless of fee structure, the revenue base itself is interest income on sovereign debt — the fund's assets are exclusively short-duration T-Bills held bankruptcy-remote with daily third-party NAV attestation. There is no equity, trade-financing, or asset-leasing structure underlying the yield; it is direct government interest, passed to token holders.

The "Midas Staked Liquidity" (MSL) facility, described in a single source, is a liquidity pool used to fund instant redemptions, with liquidity providers presumably earning a return for supplying capital against a fixed instant-redemption fee. Documentation on MSL's reward formula, custody model, and lock-up terms is not available in the material reviewed, but insofar as it draws on a pool whose underlying value is Treasury-interest-bearing mTBILL, any yield to MSL participants would also trace back to interest income rather than profit-and-loss-sharing or genuine risk-bearing activity.


Gharar — How much uncertainty does Midas mTBILL involve?

Midas is a transparent, regulated, well-documented project, which substantially reduces uncertainty relative to typical crypto ventures. The main ambiguities are around centralized admin controls and the sparse documentation of the MSL staking-like mechanism. Overall gharar is low to moderate, driven more by governance concentration than by opacity of information.

Assessment: Moderate Gharar (Material Uncertainty) Score: 51.4/100

Our methodology examines 15 criteria including team transparency, audit quality, and governance.

The Midas RWA/mTBILL entity is led by named, credentialed individuals — Dennis Dinkelmeyer (ex-Goldman Sachs/Capital Group) and Fabrice Grinda (OLX co-founder) — with additional named staff disclosed publicly. The platform is described as BaFin-regulated and MiCA-compliant, having raised $8.75M from Framework Ventures, BlockTower Capital, HV Capital and Coinbase. One source names different founders, a minor inconsistency, but no evidence of fraud attaches to this entity. Contracts are open-source on GitHub with documentation, and the team itself discloses centralization risk around admin minting, burning, blacklisting and oracle-setting powers.

Hacken completed a smart-contract audit in December 2023, scoring 10/10 with issues resolved or accepted. Further review by Côme du Crest is referenced via GitBook, and a Sherlock audit contest ran in May 2024, with links to these audits published in Midas's own documentation. Collateral composition, NAV methodology and fee schedules are clearly disclosed. The main remaining gap is the MSL staking-like mechanism, whose contract classification, custody model and reward source are not documented in available sources — an isolated but real disclosure gap.


Maysir — Does Midas mTBILL involve gambling or speculation?

mTBILL is not designed as a speculative or gambling instrument; it is a redemption-based claim on a portfolio of short-term Treasury Bills, priced by NAV rather than market sentiment. Secondary-market trading and third-party leverage integrations introduce some speculative use, but this is external to the token's design. The base protocol itself is oriented toward capital preservation, not chance-based payoff.

Assessment: Moderate Maysir (High Risk) Score: 53.5/100

Our methodology examines 11 criteria to determine whether Midas mTBILL is a gambling instrument or a genuine economic tool.

mTBILL's real-world utility is direct: it gives DeFi users on-chain exposure to short-duration US Treasury Bill yield, continuously minted and redeemed at NAV against actual T-Bill holdings referencing BlackRock's BUIDL and Superstate's USTB. Its price tracks the underlying portfolio value rather than speculative demand, and KYC/AML gating plus blacklist capability further discourage anonymous, casino-style trading. This is a productive, asset-backed financial instrument, not a zero-sum wagering mechanism, even though its underlying yield source raises separate riba concerns addressed elsewhere.

TVL grew from roughly $3M in September 2024 to over $60M by April 2025, reflecting genuine institutional and DeFi adoption via integrations with Morpho, Pendle and Euler, rather than pump-driven speculation. Third-party protocols like Bit Protocol allow users to borrow against mTBILL for leveraged yield strategies; this leverage-seeking behavior is a third-party application of the collateral, not a feature Midas itself promotes, and should not be read as evidence that the base token is designed for speculation. On balance, mTBILL's own design favors stability and utility over gambling-like dynamics.


The Full 27-Point Screening

1. Legitimacy (4 criteria)

CriterionScoreAnalysis
Team Transparency78/100Named, credentialed founders (Dinkelmeyer, Grinda) and staff are traceable via professional profiles and press, though one source shows a conflicting founder attribution.
Fraud & Scam Risk70/100No fraud/rug indicators are found for the audited, regulated mTBILL issuer itself; an unrelated same-named platform's past collapse is a different company and not evidence against this project.
Use Case Legitimacy88/100Clear real-world utility bringing tokenized Treasury exposure on-chain with DeFi composability.
Ethical Practices20/100The coin's own design centers on exposure to interest-bearing government debt, an inherently riba-based instrument by nature.

Summary: See the criterion analysis above.


2. Project Operations (9 criteria)

CriterionScoreAnalysis
Core Protocol Business15/100The base protocol's core business is tokenizing interest-bearing sovereign debt instruments.
Transaction Fees65/100Fees are transparent service fees (management/performance/redemption) rather than riba-like extraction, though the fee waiver period limits full long-run assessment.
Treasury Assets10/100Collateral/treasury composition is exclusively short-duration US Treasury Bills, an interest-bearing asset class.
Revenue Model12/100Revenue to holders is fundamentally pass-through Treasury interest, supplemented by AUM-based fees.
Transparency82/100Contracts are open-source, audits are published, and daily NAV attestations are provided by an independent agent.
Governance25/100Admin roles retain centralized control over minting, burning, blacklisting and oracle pricing, a risk the team itself discloses.
Launch Fairness55/100mTBILL is minted on-demand at NAV rather than via fixed pre-mine/insider allocation, but sources do not explicitly discuss launch fairness.
Token Distribution45/100No specific team/investor allocation or vesting breakdown for mTBILL appears in the sources; the continuous mint/redeem model reduces but does not eliminate uncertainty.
Speculation/Utility Ratio82/100The token is utility-dominant, functioning as a yield-bearing Treasury-exposure instrument rather than a speculative meme asset.

Summary: See the criterion analysis above.


3. Financial Health (4 criteria)

CriterionScoreAnalysis
Protocol Revenue12/100Revenue passed to holders originates in Treasury Bill interest, a riba-based source.
Financial Status72/100TVL grew from roughly $3M to over $60M with multi-chain rollout and daily attestations indicating transparent, stable operations.
Interest Assessment8/100The base protocol's entire product is built on interest income from Treasury Bills, an explicit interest structure at the protocol level.
Audit Quality78/100Multiple named audits exist: Hacken (December 2023, scored 10/10) and Côme du Crest reviews, plus a Sherlock audit contest in May 2024.

Summary: See the criterion analysis above.


4. Token Economics (5 criteria)

CriterionScoreAnalysis
Token Purpose82/100mTBILL functions as a genuine utility/investment token representing a Treasury-Bill claim, not a meme.
Governance RightsN/ANo governance rights are described for mTBILL holders; the token is purely an investment/redemption instrument and this absence raises no independent Shariah concern.
Rewards Distribution15/100Yield varies with market rates but is fundamentally interest income from Treasury Bills, distributed via NAV appreciation.
Speculation Controls55/100KYC/AML, permissioning and blacklist controls plus NAV-based price stability limit purely speculative use, though sources give no dedicated anti-speculation mechanics.
Asset Backing12/100Backing is 100% short-duration US Treasury Bills, an interest-bearing sovereign-debt asset class, independently attested daily.

Summary: See the criterion analysis above.


5. Staking Mechanism (5 criteria)

CriterionScoreAnalysis
Mechanism Type35/100A "Midas Staked Liquidity" facility is mentioned for funding instant redemptions, but custody type, delegation model and lock-up terms are undocumented in the sources.
Islamic Contract Classification20/100 (low evidence)Sources do not classify the MSL mechanism's underlying contract structure under any Islamic finance framework, leaving its classification unresolved.
Rewards Structure65/100 (low evidence)Analysis unavailable for this criterion.
Documentation60/100 (low evidence)Analysis unavailable for this criterion.
Shariah Alignment60/100 (low evidence)Analysis unavailable for this criterion.

Summary: See the criterion analysis above.


Overall Assessment: Midas mTBILL presents a mixed Shariah profile; review each dimension above and consult a qualified scholar for your situation.

Sources consulted