Reality Metaverse RMV
Rank #2010Gaming (GameFi)NFTMetaverse
Mashbooh · Doubtful · Risky
Quick Answer

Is Reality Metaverse halal?

Reality Metaverse is classified as doubtful (mashbooh), with a Shariah compliance score of 52.9/100 under our 27-point screening methodology.

Overall52.9Mashbooh · Doubtful · Risky
Riba60.5Mashbooh
Gharar44.3Mashbooh
Maysir52.6Mashbooh
Full reportMethodology
52.960.5RIBA44.3GHARAR52.6MAYSIR
Gharar 44.3/100 · Review
Project diligence tap a tile →
Moderate RibaExcessive Gharar (High Uncertainty)Moderate Maysir (High Risk)

GhararSharia pillar · 44.3/100 · Review · 15 criteria

Mashbooh. Prohibition of contracts with excessive ambiguity or hidden risk.

Sign in free to see which criteria these scores belong to.

Team Transparency & Credibility72
Ethical Practices55
Transparency35
Governance25
Launch Fairness45
Token Distribution40
Speculation / Utility Ratio50
Financial Status35
Audit Quality10
Governance Rights50
Rewards Distribution70
Asset Backing45
Mechanism Type70
Documentation60
Shariah Alignment60
How RMV compares
Aavegotchi
54.7
Aurory
54.6
Cornucopias
53.9
★ Reality Metaverse (RMV)
52.9
Radio Caca
43.5

Compare directly: vs Aavegotchi · vs Aurory · vs Cornucopias

Purify your profits from RMV

A portion of profit from RMV isn't fully yours to keep — here's how to return it

What does "purification" mean?

No screening is ever perfectly clean. Even a fully compliant asset can pick up small amounts of tainted income along the way — through treasury interest, reward structures, or edge cases in how it operates. Purification isn't a fee or a penalty.It's identifying that one tainted slice and giving it back.

Purification amount is calculated, not guessed— based on its riba, gharar, and maysir screening across our 27-point methodology. See exactly how we calculate it →

Where it goes, and who's watching

Every donation is overseen by Imam Omar Siddiqi, Shariah scholar and Imam of JMIC, and paid directly — wallet-to-wallet — to Jamiya Masjid & Islamic Centre, a UK registered charity (no. 1089986). CryptoUmmah never touches or holds your funds at any point. Always verify the destination address in your wallet before confirming.

One thing to know: this isn't Zakat, and it isn't tax-deductible. It's the return of income that was never fully yours — not an act of generosity, and not a substitute for your other religious obligations.

Mashbooh · Doubtful · Risky

Your exact purification amount, calculated from Reality Metaverse's Shariah compliance score.

$
Amount to return0.00 USDC

to Jamiya Masjid & Islamic Centre, a registered UK charity

Scholar-verified · UK registered charity
Key facts
ChainEthereum
Last reviewed
ThanvirWritten by ThanvirFounder, Ex Director S&P Global EnergyImam Omar SiddiqiReviewed by Imam Omar SiddiqiShariah Scholar
Analyst summary

Reality Metaverse (RMV) powers in-game transactions and royalty rewards across a named team's game portfolio (Landlord GO, Reality Rush, Weather Challenge, Monopoly World), with periodic token burns and no proof-of-work mining involved. No audit firm — Halborn or otherwise — has published a report covering RMV's own smart contracts, despite Halborn audits existing for dozens of unrelated projects reviewed in research. With 1B total supply and a combined 56.5% allocated to Foundation and Insiders vesting through April 2028, the single biggest Shariah consideration is unresolved gharar: an unaudited contract layer paired with concentrated, partly opaque treasury holdings, rather than any interest-based revenue model.

The research

27-point Shariah breakdown of RMV

Islamic Finance Principles Assessment

Riba — Does Reality Metaverse involve interest?

Reality Metaverse's disclosed revenue comes from marketplace royalties, NFT primary sales, and game-specific royalty pools rather than interest-bearing lending. No source describes RMV or its treasury holding interest-bearing instruments or engaging in debt-based financing. On this basis, the protocol's revenue model itself does not raise direct riba concerns for Muslim investors, though the composition of its treasury remains undisclosed.

Assessment: Moderate Riba Score: 60.5/100

Our methodology examines 10 criteria to evaluate how well Reality Metaverse avoids interest-based mechanisms.

RMV's income streams are explicitly fee- and royalty-based: a standard 30% royalty share to holders, rising to 50% during Weather Challenge promotions and 50-80% on primary NFT sales, funded by marketplace activity and periodic burns such as the roughly 1.4% burn recorded in February 2025. None of these mechanisms resemble interest payments on a loan. However, the treasury, stated at approximately 18% of total supply, has no disclosed asset composition — it is unclear whether reserves are held in cash, stablecoins, or interest-bearing instruments. This gap is a transparency shortfall rather than confirmed evidence of riba, and it remains an open question for investors.

The base RMV protocol, as described across available sources, functions as a rewards and royalty-distribution system tied to gameplay and NFT marketplace activity — not as a lending or borrowing platform. No source attributes an interest-bearing yield mechanism, collateralized lending pool, or debt instrument to RMV itself; DeFi lending references appearing in research belong entirely to unrelated protocols. There is likewise no evidence of interest-based partnerships with banks or centralized finance intermediaries. On available information, RMV's core business model — game royalties funneled to token holders — sits outside the riba framework, though the absence of a public audit means smart-contract-level guarantees cannot be independently verified.

Gharar — How much uncertainty does Reality Metaverse involve?

Our assessment of Reality Metaverse on this principle is set out below.

Assessment: Excessive Gharar (High Uncertainty) Score: 44.3/100

Our methodology examines 15 criteria including team transparency, audit quality, and governance.

Maysir — Does Reality Metaverse involve gambling or speculation?

Our assessment of Reality Metaverse on this principle is set out below.

Assessment: Moderate Maysir (High Risk) Score: 52.6/100

Our methodology examines 11 criteria to determine whether Reality Metaverse is a gambling instrument or a genuine economic tool.

The Full 27-Point Screening

1. Legitimacy (4 criteria)

CriterionScoreAnalysis
Team Transparency72/100The founding team is publicly named with LinkedIn profiles and a verifiable prior commercial track record from Landlord GO.
Fraud & Scam Risk60/100No fraud, hack, or rug-pull allegations against RMV specifically were found, but sources offer limited independent verification.
Use Case Legitimacy65/100The project ties its token to functioning game titles and royalty programs, indicating genuine utility beyond hype.
Ethical Practices55/100The ecosystem includes lootbox and NFT-sale mechanics that carry gharar-like characteristics worth noting, though this is a design feature rather than confirmed haram intent, and third-party misuse elsewhere is not determinative.

Summary: The team behind Reality Metaverse is named and carries a prior gaming track record, with no fraud or rug-pull indicators found specifically against the project in these sources.

2. Project Operations (9 criteria)

CriterionScoreAnalysis
Core Protocol Business60/100The base protocol operates in gaming/metaverse services, a sector not inherently prohibited.
Transaction Fees65/100Fees are handled through periodic burns and royalty distribution rather than interest extraction.
Treasury Assets30/100 (low evidence)Treasury allocation size is known but its asset composition (e.g., interest-bearing holdings) is not disclosed anywhere in the sources.
Revenue Model72/100Revenue comes from marketplace fees, royalties, and NFT sales, none of which are interest-based.
Transparency35/100A whitepaper and public updates exist, but open-source code status and full governance disclosure are not confirmed.
Governance25/100 (low evidence)No governance framework or decision-making structure for RMV holders is described in any source.
Launch Fairness45/100Vesting schedules exist, but sizeable Foundation and Insider allocations suggest the launch was not fully fair to public participants.
Token Distribution40/100Foundation holds the largest single share (39.5%) with Insiders at 17%, indicating notable concentration.
Speculation/Utility Ratio50/100In-game utility is real but token discourse also centers heavily on unlock events and trading, suggesting a mixed speculation/utility balance.

Summary: RMV functions within a gaming/metaverse ecosystem with fee burns and royalty distribution, though governance structure, treasury composition, and open-source status remain undisclosed, and token allocation is notably concentrated toward the Foundation and Insiders.

3. Financial Health (4 criteria)

CriterionScoreAnalysis
Protocol Revenue72/100Royalty and fee-based revenue streams are described with no interest-based component.
Financial Status35/100 (low evidence)No data on overall financial stability, reserves, or market standing is provided in the sources.
Interest Assessment70/100No lending, borrowing, or interest mechanism at the protocol level is described, though this is an inference from absence rather than explicit confirmation.
Audit Quality10/100 (low evidence)No security audit specifically covering Reality Metaverse/RMV could be located among the retrieved sources; unrelated Halborn reports appear instead.

Summary: Revenue derives from non-interest royalty and marketplace fees with no protocol-level lending or borrowing described, but no audit of RMV's smart contracts could be found in the sources and overall financial stability data is absent.

4. Token Economics (5 criteria)

CriterionScoreAnalysis
Token Purpose62/100The token is used functionally for in-game transactions and reward distribution, indicating genuine utility purpose.
Governance Rights50/100 (low evidence)Analysis unavailable for this criterion.
Rewards Distribution70/100Reward/royalty percentages are explicitly variable and tied to product performance and revenue phases.
Speculation Controls45/100Vesting cliffs and periodic burns provide some speculative control, but no dedicated anti-speculation mechanism is described.
Asset Backing45/100The token is backed by ecosystem game revenue and utility rather than by disclosed hard or halal reserve assets.

Summary: RMV serves a stated in-game utility function with variable royalty-based rewards and periodic burns, but lacks disclosed governance rights and dedicated anti-speculation mechanisms.

5. Staking Mechanism

Reality Metaverse has no native staking mechanism, so these five criteria are not applicable and are excluded from the score entirely rather than counted as zeros.

Overall Assessment: Reality Metaverse presents as a named, functioning gaming/metaverse project with non-interest revenue mechanics, but material gaps in governance disclosure, treasury transparency, and independent security audit leave several Shariah-relevant questions unresolved based on current sources.

Scores above are unlocked. Sign in free to see criterion names and the full written analysis.

Sources consulted