Islamic Finance Principles Assessment
Riba — Does STASIS EURO involve interest?
Stasis Euro itself pays no yield to holders — it is a plain redemption claim on euros, not an interest-bearing instrument. The concern is upstream: the issuer's revenue model and its cash reserves sitting in conventional banks. On balance, EURS avoids riba at the token level, though the treasury's banking relationships warrant a light purification allocation for any incidental interest accrued on reserves.
Assessment: Minor Riba
Score: 85.7/100
Our methodology examines 10 criteria to evaluate how well STASIS EURO avoids interest-based mechanisms.
STASIS earns its revenue from fiat-to-token conversion fees (0.1%–0.25%), not from lending spreads or interest arbitrage — a structurally cleaner model than yield-bearing stablecoins. However, the euro reserves backing EURS are held in cash accounts at BankFrick and verified by BDO; conventional bank deposits of this kind ordinarily generate interest for the depositor. Nothing in available disclosures confirms these are segregated into non-interest, wa'ad, or Shariah-compliant custody accounts, so a portion of treasury income may derive from interest the company is unlikely to explicitly disclose or exclude.
The core business is custodial issuance and redemption, not lending or borrowing. STASIS itself does not extend credit, offer margin, or promise yield on EURS holdings — sources confirm there is no native staking or interest mechanism built into the token. Third-party venues such as Aave, Wirex and YouHodler let users lend EURS for interest, but these are external dApps layered on top of the token, not features of STASIS's own protocol or revenue model, and their existence does not implicate the coin's own design.
Gharar — How much uncertainty does STASIS EURO involve?
Uncertainty around EURS is comparatively low: leadership is named, the entity is registered in Malta, and reserves are independently attested. Some ambiguity remains around audit recency and the ~77m unburned redeemed-token surplus reported in treasury. Overall, EURS carries manageable, disclosed gharar rather than structural opacity.
Assessment: Minor Gharar (Mostly Clear)
Score: 71.5/100
Our methodology examines 15 criteria including team transparency, audit quality, and governance.
STASIS's leadership — CEO Gregory Klumov, CTO Anatoliy Knyazev, CFO Vyacheslav Kim, CLO Konstantin Orlov — is publicly named with verifiable professional backgrounds, and the issuing entity STSS (Malta) Limited is a registered, regulator-facing company claiming MiCA alignment. Contracts are open-source. This is a materially more transparent structure than anonymous-team tokens, and the six-year operating history with €5.5bn+ in reported transfers and no disclosed hacks or loss events further reduces informational uncertainty for prospective holders.
CoinFabrik audited the original SETToken.sol suite at launch, and CertiK performed a static/manual review in 2021 reporting zero critical, major or medium findings. No more recent independent audit of the current contract set was found in available sources, which is a gharar concern worth naming plainly for a token still actively deployed across five-plus chains. Reserve verification, by contrast, is frequent and Big Four-attested, giving reasonable — though not fully current from a code-security standpoint — assurance.
Maysir — Does STASIS EURO involve gambling or speculation?
EURS is not designed for speculation: it is a par-issued, par-redeemed euro claim intended to hold a stable value rather than generate trading gains. Its use case is payments and settlement, not wagering on price movement. The instrument itself carries essentially no maysir characteristics.
Assessment: Minor Maysir (Incidental)
Score: 80/100
Our methodology examines 11 criteria to determine whether STASIS EURO is a gambling instrument or a genuine economic tool.
EURS functions as a euro-denominated settlement rail, used for cross-border transfers, treasury management and as a non-USD trading pair across 175 countries and 250,000+ reported bank transfers. Its 1:1 peg-and-redemption mechanism is explicitly an anti-speculation control: value is anchored to reserves rather than market sentiment, and holders gain nothing from price appreciation because there is none by design. This directly distinguishes EURS from speculative or reward-seeking tokens and aligns its function with real economic utility.
Circulating supply has fallen from a peak of €124m to roughly €7.36m, indicating EURS is now a niche liquidity and settlement tool rather than a heavily traded asset, which if anything reduces exposure to secondary-market speculative churn. Any speculative behavior around EURS occurs off-protocol — e.g., using it as a stable leg in leveraged trades on external exchanges — and reflects user choice rather than the coin's own design, which remains a stable, redemption-backed instrument built for productive payment use rather than gambling-like price exposure.
The Full 27-Point Screening
1. Legitimacy (4 criteria)
| Criterion | Score | Analysis |
|---|
| Team Transparency | 85/100 | Team members are named with verifiable professional/educational backgrounds and a registered Malta corporate entity. |
| Fraud & Scam Risk | 80/100 | No fraud, hack or rug-pull indicators tied to STASIS were found; sources describe a multi-year record with zero reported security losses. |
| Use Case Legitimacy | 90/100 | Clear real-world use as a payments, remittance and DeFi-liquidity euro stablecoin is documented. |
| Ethical Practices | 80/100 | The coin's own design is a neutral payment/settlement instrument; some marketed third-party use cases include leverage trading, which per the stated judgment principle does not itself lower this score. |
Summary: STASIS is run by a named, credentialed team operating a registered Malta entity with a multi-year operating history and no reported fraud or hack incidents in the sources reviewed.
2. Project Operations (9 criteria)
| Criterion | Score | Analysis |
|---|
| Core Protocol Business | 90/100 | The base protocol is a fiat-euro-pegged stablecoin, not operating in a prohibited sector. |
| Transaction Fees | 85/100 | Fees are service-based conversion fees, not interest, and the on-chain transfer fee was reduced to zero. |
| Treasury Assets | 75/100 | The issuer claims a 100% liquid cash-euro reserve policy even in favorable interest-rate environments, but the exact instrument mix is not fully itemized. |
| Revenue Model | 85/100 | Revenue is generated from conversion fees rather than interest-based lending. |
| Transparency | 85/100 | Contracts are open-source and audited, and reserve reporting is published on a recurring schedule. |
| Governance | 25/100 | Governance is explicitly centralized, with the company controlling token and treasury contracts via multi-sig rather than decentralized voting. |
| Launch Fairness | 55/100 | No evidence of an insider presale or unfair allocation was found, but the deposit-driven minting model is not documented in fairness terms. |
| Token Distribution | 55/100 | No team/investor token-allocation or vesting data specific to EURS could be located in these sources. |
| Speculation/Utility Ratio | 90/100 | The token is utility-dominant, designed for payments and settlement rather than speculation. |
Summary: EURS is a multi-chain, fee-based euro stablecoin with open-source, audited contracts, but its governance and treasury controls remain centralized under the issuing company rather than decentralized.
3. Financial Health (4 criteria)
| Criterion | Score | Analysis |
|---|
| Protocol Revenue | 85/100 | Protocol revenue comes from conversion fees rather than riba-based interest. |
| Financial Status | 75/100 | Sources document years of operation and billions in transfer volume, though recent liquidity is described as modest. |
| Interest Assessment | 90/100 | Sources state explicitly the base protocol offers no native lending, borrowing or yield. |
| Audit Quality | 75/100 | Named audits (CoinFabrik at launch; CertiK dated 3/24/2021–4/2/2021 with zero critical/major/medium findings) are documented, though the most recent audit is several years old. |
Summary: The protocol earns fee-based revenue and holds cash-euro reserves verified by an external accounting firm, offers no native lending/yield itself, and has been audited by named firms though the most recent contract audit is dated 2021.
4. Token Economics (5 criteria)
| Criterion | Score | Analysis |
|---|
| Token Purpose | 90/100 | EURS functions as a genuine utility/payment token representing a redeemable euro claim, not a meme asset. |
| Governance Rights | N/A | Sources confirm holders have no governance rights, which is a neutral design feature for a pegged stablecoin rather than a Shariah concern. |
| Rewards Distribution | N/A | There is no native reward mechanism; the token simply mirrors the euro peg rather than promising fixed or variable returns. |
| Speculation Controls | N/A | EURS is an inherently stable pegged asset, so speculation-control mechanisms beyond the peg/redemption structure are not applicable. |
| Asset Backing | 90/100 | The token is backed by a verified cash-euro reserve with recurring third-party (BDO) verification. |
Summary: EURS is a utility token representing a redeemable euro claim with no governance rights and no built-in reward mechanism, its value anchored to a verified fiat reserve rather than speculative mechanics.
5. Staking Mechanism
STASIS EURO has no native staking mechanism, so these five criteria are not applicable and are excluded from the score entirely rather than counted as zeros.
Overall Assessment: EURS presents as a transparent, reserve-backed, fee-revenue euro stablecoin with a traceable team and audited contracts, whose main compliance-relevant caveats are centralized governance and limited disclosure on exact reserve composition and token-distribution fairness.