Onocoy Token ONO
Rank #2464InfrastructureSolana EcosystemDePIN
Mashbooh · Doubtful · Risky
Quick Answer

Is Onocoy Token halal?

Onocoy Token is classified as doubtful (mashbooh), with a Shariah compliance score of 66.6/100 under our 27-point screening methodology.

Overall66.6Mashbooh · Doubtful · Risky
Riba73.1Halal
Gharar58.3Mashbooh
Maysir67.5Mashbooh
Full reportMethodology
66.673.1RIBA58.3GHARAR67.5MAYSIR
Shariah screening · tap a sub-dial
Project diligence tap a tile →
Minor RibaModerate Gharar (Material Uncertainty)Moderate Maysir (High Risk)

GhararSharia pillar · 58.3/100 · Review · 15 criteria

Mashbooh. Prohibition of contracts with excessive ambiguity or hidden risk.

Sign in free to see which criteria these scores belong to.

Team Transparency & Credibility88
Ethical Practices90
Transparency58
Governance42
Launch Fairness55
Token Distribution38
Speculation / Utility Ratio74
Financial Status55
Audit Quality10
Governance Rights52
Rewards Distribution76
Asset Backing62
Mechanism Type0
Documentation0
Shariah Alignment0
How ONO compares
★ Onocoy Token (ONO)
66.6
Geodnet
65
Aethir
58.2
NATIX Network
56.9
Homebrew Robotics
44.3

Compare directly: vs Homebrew Robotics · vs Geodnet · vs Aethir

Purify your profits from ONO

A portion of profit from ONO isn't fully yours to keep — here's how to return it

What does "purification" mean?

Even fully screened assets can pick up small amounts of tainted income along the way — purification means giving that specific portion back, not paying extra.

Based on Onocoy Token's riba, gharar and maysir screening — see how we calculate purification amounts.

Overseen by Imam Omar Siddiqi, Shariah scholar and Imam of JMIC, among others, with donations paid directly to Jamiya Masjid & Islamic Centre — UK registered charity no. 1089986. Sent wallet-to-wallet; CryptoUmmah never custodies your funds. Always verify the destination address before confirming in your wallet.

Mashbooh · Doubtful · Risky

Your exact purification amount, calculated from Onocoy Token's Shariah compliance score.

$
Amount to return0.00 USDC

to Jamiya Masjid & Islamic Centre, a registered UK charity

Purification isn't Zakat and isn't tax-deductible — it's the return of income that wasn't rightfully yours.

Scholar-verified · UK registered charity
Key facts
ChainSolana
Last reviewed
ThanvirWritten by ThanvirFounder, Ex Director S&P Global EnergyImam Omar SiddiqiReviewed by Imam Omar SiddiqiShariah Scholar
Analyst summary

Onocoy (ONO) powers a decentralized GNSS correction-data network (DePIN), where physical "miner" stations earn variable rewards for streaming high-precision positioning data, converted into non-transferable, fiat-pegged Data Credits burned upon use. No Onocoy-specific smart contract audit was found in available sources, only unrelated third-party reports (Halborn for Ondo, MonoX, APY). Distribution concerns include a PinkSale presale with vesting and reported centralization of at least one governance parameter to a single owner. The single biggest Shariah consideration is this documentation gap combined with governance centralization risk, layered onto an otherwise genuinely utility-driven, revenue-backed infrastructure token.

The research

27-point Shariah breakdown of ONO

Islamic Finance Principles Assessment

Riba — Does Onocoy Token involve interest?

Onocoy's design shows no direct interest-bearing mechanism: revenue comes from real B2B GNSS data sales, and rewards to network operators are usage-based rather than fixed. There is no protocol-level lending or borrowing described in official documentation. For Muslim investors, the core token model appears free of riba, though a third-party article describing collateralized borrowing against ONO warrants caution since it is unconfirmed.

Assessment: Minor Riba Score: 73.1/100

Our methodology examines 10 criteria to evaluate how well Onocoy Token avoids interest-based mechanisms.

Onocoy's treasury is funded by fiat revenue from selling GNSS correction data to B2B clients, a straightforward commercial sale of a service rather than an interest-bearing financial product. This revenue supports operations and funds ONO buybacks tied to a burn-and-mint mechanism. No evidence in official sources indicates the treasury holds interest-bearing instruments, bonds, or lending positions. This revenue-from-real-service model is a positive feature distinguishing Onocoy from projects whose treasuries depend on yield farming or interest-bearing reserves.

Rewards paid to Onocoy's GNSS reference-station operators are explicitly variable, calculated from data quality, uptime, geographic scarcity, and actual network usage rather than fixed guaranteed returns. This performance-based structure resembles a service fee for genuine infrastructure work rather than interest on capital. Separately, a third-party article describes an ONO "staking" product with APY and collateralized borrowing, but this is not corroborated by Onocoy's own documentation and appears templated. On the balance of confirmed sources, no fixed-return, riba-like reward mechanism is documented in Onocoy's official design.

Gharar — How much uncertainty does Onocoy Token involve?

Onocoy carries moderate uncertainty: strong team transparency and real commercial traction reduce risk, but the absence of a project-specific audit and unclear allocation details raise it. On balance, informed investors face a manageable but non-trivial level of gharar.

Assessment: Moderate Gharar (Material Uncertainty) Score: 58.3/100

Our methodology examines 15 criteria including team transparency, audit quality, and governance.

The Onocoy team is publicly named and professionally verifiable, including President Daniel Ammann (ETH Zurich, u-blox co-founder), CEO Thomas Nigg, blockchain lead Mark Ballandies, and crypto economist Samuel Welde, alongside a dozen listed contributors and advisors. Governance operates through a registered non-profit, the onocoy Association. No fraud, hack, or regulatory action was found tied specifically to Onocoy. This level of named, traceable leadership and institutional structure substantially reduces informational opacity compared to anonymous or pseudonymous projects common in the sector.

No audit report specific to Onocoy's own smart contracts or ONO token was found among available sources; retrieved audit material instead covers unrelated projects (Ondo Finance, MonoX, APY via Halborn) and generic listing pages. This absence of a project-specific audit is a genuine gharar concern and should be treated as such, particularly given a noted centralization of at least one reward-fee governance parameter to a single owner. Tokenomics documentation (supply cap, halving schedule, dual-token burn-and-mint model) is otherwise reasonably detailed and disclosed.

Maysir — Does Onocoy Token involve gambling or speculation?

Onocoy is not designed as a speculative gambling instrument; its token economy is anchored to real GNSS data services and physical infrastructure operation. Some secondary-market speculation on ONO's price is possible, as with any tradeable token, but this is incidental to, not the purpose of, its design. The project's core mechanics point toward productive utility rather than maysir.

Assessment: Moderate Maysir (High Risk) Score: 67.5/100

Our methodology examines 11 criteria to determine whether Onocoy Token is a gambling instrument or a genuine economic tool.

Onocoy's ONO token functions within a genuine DePIN model: operators run physical GNSS reference stations that deliver high-precision correction data purchased by real B2B clients, with growing miner counts (from roughly 3,725 to over 7,500 in 2025) and named partnerships including Septentrio, WeatherXM, and Stargate. The dual-token structure separates speculative ONO from non-transferable, fiat-pegged Data Credits burned upon actual data use, tying token velocity to real service consumption rather than pure price speculation. This productive, revenue-generating utility clearly distinguishes Onocoy from zero-sum speculative instruments.

Against this genuine utility, ONO remains a tradeable, capped-supply token subject to ordinary secondary-market speculation, and its presale-and-vesting launch structure (10% unlocked at TGE, remainder vesting over 90 days) can attract short-term speculative flippers regardless of the project's underlying design. Such third-party trading behavior does not stem from any flaw in Onocoy's own mechanics and should not be held against the coin itself. Weighed together, real adoption and usage-linked burn mechanics outweigh incidental market speculation in assessing the token's own design.

The Full 27-Point Screening

1. Legitimacy (4 criteria)

CriterionScoreAnalysis
Team Transparency88/100Founders and multiple team members are named with verifiable professional histories (u-blox, ETH Zurich, KPMG, Accenture).
Fraud & Scam Risk62/100No fraud, hack, or rug-pull allegations against Onocoy appear in the sources, but this is an absence-of-evidence inference, not a positive clearance.
Use Case Legitimacy82/100Sources describe a concrete real-world GNSS correction-data service with paying B2B clients.
Ethical Practices90/100The protocol's own function—satellite positioning data infrastructure—has no inherent haram element.

Summary: The team behind Onocoy is publicly named with verifiable professional backgrounds, and no fraud or scam indicators were found in the sources, though independent verification remains limited.

2. Project Operations (9 criteria)

CriterionScoreAnalysis
Core Protocol Business86/100Core business is GNSS data infrastructure, a neutral technical/utility sector.
Transaction Fees78/100Fee flow (Data Credit burn triggering ONO buyback/burn/reward split) is documented and non-interest-based.
Treasury Assets55/100Treasury is described as fiat revenue used for operations/buybacks, but no detail on whether any funds sit in interest-bearing instruments.
Revenue Model80/100Revenue comes from fee-for-service data sales, not interest or lending income.
Transparency58/100A public whitepaper and documentation site exist, but open-source status of the smart contracts is not confirmed in these sources.
Governance42/100Governance is nominally DAO/Association-based with token voting, but one source describes current control of a key reward parameter as resting with a single owner.
Launch Fairness55/100A presale (PinkSale) plus vesting schedule is disclosed, but comparative fairness versus community allocation cannot be judged from the sources.
Token Distribution38/100 (low evidence)No breakdown of team/investor/community token allocation percentages was found in the sources.
Speculation/Utility Ratio74/100Reward and burn mechanics are explicitly tied to real network usage rather than pure trading speculation.

Summary: Onocoy operates a decentralized GNSS correction-data network with a documented dual-token, burn-and-mint fee model, though governance currently shows a noted centralisation point and full token allocation details are not disclosed.

3. Financial Health (4 criteria)

CriterionScoreAnalysis
Protocol Revenue80/100Protocol revenue is described as fee-based data sales, not riba-based.
Financial Status55/100Growth metrics (miner count, B2B clients) are disclosed, but no full financial statements or balance sheet are available.
Interest Assessment68/100Official documentation describes no protocol-level lending/borrowing, though an unrelated third-party article mentions collateral/borrowing features that could not be verified as genuine.
Audit Quality10/100 (low evidence)No audit report specific to Onocoy's own contracts or token was found among the sources; all audit material retrieved pertains to unrelated projects.

Summary: The protocol generates genuine fee-based revenue from GNSS data sales with no protocol-level lending or interest disclosed, but no audit specific to Onocoy could be located in the sources.

4. Token Economics (5 criteria)

CriterionScoreAnalysis
Token Purpose78/100ONO is explicitly documented as a utility token with reward, access, and governance functions.
Governance Rights52/100Square-root token voting is described, but real decentralisation is undercut by a noted current single-owner control point.
Rewards Distribution76/100Rewards documented as variable, based on station quality, uptime, location and usage, not fixed.
Speculation Controls70/100Dual-token design and multi-month vesting schedule are explicit anti-speculation mechanisms.
Asset Backing62/100Token value is tied to genuine network utility and real revenue rather than a financial reserve, though no formal backing disclosure exists.

Summary: ONO is designed and documented as a capped-supply utility token with variable, usage-based rewards and built-in anti-speculation mechanisms via its dual-token structure.

5. Staking Mechanism

Onocoy Token has no native staking mechanism, so these five criteria are not applicable and are excluded from the score entirely rather than counted as zeros.

Overall Assessment: Onocoy presents as a transparent, utility-driven DePIN project with a credentialed team and real revenue, whose main open Shariah-relevant gaps are the absence of a located third-party audit and limited disclosure on governance centralisation and token allocation.

Sources consulted